« random » thoughts, not « blasés », « à la Pascal »
#1: In the mystery of the mind lies the reason of the heart
When one remembers or when one fancies, a part of the process comes from one’s own volition, and the rest is mystery.
“It’s only love’s illusions, that I recalled.
I really don’t know love. I really don’t know love at all.”
With her song Both Sides Now, Joni Mitchell demonstrates that even a skillful dedicated poet, who diligently analyzed love from “both sides” still, somehow, can only recall love’s illusions. Joni Mitchell humbly and solemnly declares that she has no clue what love really entails.
The fate of the poet is akin to the fate of the prophet:
[John – Jesus saying he’s only the conduit for God’s judgement]
#2: Guilty pleasures are not to be found in cigarettes, wine, and chocolate
Pleasures are guilty when they consist in finding joy in the idea of the suffering of others.
Guilty pleasures are sins when they are felt by scoffers, unaware of their surroundings and/or of the extent of the suffering of those subjected to the scoffing.
Guilty pleasures belong to the wicked, not the sinner, when, once aware of their surroundings, the wicked person finds additional joy in the idea of the suffering of many, either pretending that said suffering isn’t all that terrible, or by asserting their dominance over the many who will never be able to escape the suffering.
Guilty pleasures are not to be found in the ways a person seeks a route to escape suffering.
Cigarettes, wine, and chocolate are not to be blamed for the guilty pleasures of the wicked. Seeking a route to escape does not make one a sinner.
“Too much and too little wine.
Give him none, he cannot find truth;
Give him too much, the same.”
Blaise Pascal’s Thoughts #71 –
Misery of Man without God
Blaise Pascal lived in France in the 17th century and died at 40. He wrote a bunch of thoughts, including this #71, which could apply to any way to get tipsy (e.g. a smooth cigarette) without getting drunk (e.g. a bad trip).
#3 : Un seul être vous ment, et tout est insensé //
Everything is matter so knowing anything matters
When a child understands that adults have been lying about Santa, the child has two choices: the child will either feel proud or be utterly disappointed, or both.
The child understanding rationally that there is no way a man can deliver all these bébelles in one night, even accounting for time zones, even if the reindeers were to travel at the speed of light, may feel a sense of superiority over their fellow children who have not yet followed the same reasoning. This child will feel proud, at first, then be utterly disappointed to understand the extent of the organized lies orchestrated by a bunch of adults, including those who hold authority over the child.
Un seul être vous ment, et tout est insensé : if the child doesn’t get a proper conversation with a sane figure of authority after the fall of the myth of Santa, the child will go on thinking lies are everywhere and in the mouth of everyone.
If they could lie about Santa, what else are they pretending?
If the child has the good fortune of finding a fellow child or at least one sensible adult with whom to talk sincerely about the myth of Santa, the child may be able to reconcile the myth of Santa with the hope of the return of peace.
Everything is matter, so knowing anything matters: a sensible and reasonable conversation with a child about the fabrication of a lie can go a long way in ensuring the child sees constructed lies from at least two sides. The side that wants as many fools as possible to pray for bébelles for Christmas, and the side that refuses to see even the poorest of children forget that there will come a day when they too can have something to be excited for.
“Though hast well said, I have no husband […] in that saidst thou truly.”
Jesus telling the Samaritan woman that she has spoken well and that she spoke the truth is what allowed her to go around her village affirming that Jesus had told her everything she had ever done all along: even though her truth seemed unbelievable to most, even though she only had reasons to feel shame about her reality in the construct of the society she lived in, she only ever spoke truly, hence she spoke so as to please God, even at the price of ostracism in her own country.
Jesus could tell she was sincere, and given her circumstances, that’s all that really mattered.
#4: Resurrection requires mutual love //
Until there is Justice, there is no peace
Resurrection requires mutual love, therefore, one can only summon the soul of someone they loved and loved them in return. The love can be figurative, if it is true. The ghost of a beloved will be comforting to whomever loves them truly. Call on the spirit of the ones you love who have passed away, and they will appear to you when you need them.
The beloved can be Elvis, Jesus, your grandmother, or Maya Angelou. It doesn’t matter if you knew them in real life, as long as your love for them is true. They too, love you.
They will visit you in your dreams. They will send you signs only you can notice, therefore only you can interpret. The signs of your beloved are for you, i.e. they resonate with you. Your beloved will be right next to you when you are happy and wish they could rejoice one more time with you. They will be the wind blowing in your sails when you are stuck and cannot find the energy to plan for your next move. They will be your guides, now that they are gone, they get to always be right next to you, only when you want and need them to.
You likely don’t want them watching you defecating. You surely need them behind you when you’re about to do something you will regret. Since you love them and they love you back, they’ll have your back, no matter what. Since you love them and they love you back, they’ll know your sins and your good deeds, no matter how hard you try to hide or convince yourself otherwise.
God gave us the ability to love one another. God knows the feelings of true love.
Therefore, Dieu réunit ceux qui s’aiment, as Édith Piaf and Céline Dion so righfully sang, after their one-true-loves were gone, as in : had passed away, and yet, both knew, on top of their lungs, from the bottom of their hearts, over the hills of their longing, despite the cold nights without René and Marcel, they were together all along.
Now that they are gone, they get to be together.
Whenever they see fit. No matter what others say or think.
The link is between them and themselves, their beloved and no other.
Therefore, the dead only come haunting for justice,
Since there is no peace, until there is Justice.
God didn’t send his only Son to bring the wonderful news of resurrection to open the gates for the devil to come haunting the living. That wouldn’t be fair. That wouldn’t be loving. That wouldn’t be like Him.
Some people were given the ability to see the ghosts. Others could hear them sing. Others could simply feel their presence, without being able to put a name, a face, or a voice to it. They felt therefore they knew. Someone else was around, they were convinced, even though ça sonne fou !
Seeing the ghosts and/or hearing them could make one create masterpieces and symphonies. Seeing the ghosts and/or hearing them could also drive insane. The souls seeking justice will not go quiet until they are heard, or they are seen. These souls became the haunting ghosts, until humanity came to understand the process of resurrection and why Jesus wept for Lazarus.
Maybe Jesus knew, since He could see, the flocks of desperate souls to come, who would haunt the living, until justice is done, and their soul is finally set free, so they can rest in peace.
That was a lot to see, and quite a reason to weep.
Maybe Jesus knew, since He could hear, the flocks of desperate souls to cry, who would haunt the living, until justice is done, and their soul is finally set free, so they can rest in peace.
That was a lot to hear, and quite a reason to weep.
Maybe Jesus knew, since He could feel, the flocks of desperate living souls, haunted by the dead seeking justice, unable to decipher the messages and exposed to the horrors of injustice, misunderstood and ostracized, solitude becoming the only place where they can rest in peace.
That was a lot to feel, and quite a reason to weep.
Some would see the ghosts in the image of their suffering: their bodies carrying the stigmas of the injustice. The ghosts would have to carry these signs so that their witnesses could be driven towards the resolution of their cases. One could assume that Jesus knew this would be quite a burden to carry, for those gifted with the ability to see the dead, resurrected.
That would be a lot to see, for any given soul, and quite a reason to weep, for the Son, the Almighty, and just about anybody.
Some would hear the ghosts in the sounds of their suffering: their voices carrying the pain of the injustice. The ghosts would have to cry their pain so that their witnesses could be driven towards the resolution of their cases. One could assume that Jesus knew this would be quite a burden to carry, for those gifted with the ability to hear the dead, resurrected.
That would be a lot to hear, for any given soul, and quite a reason to weep, for the Son, the Almighty, and just about anybody.
Some would feel the ghosts in the remanence of their suffering: no image, no voice, only convoluted signs of the injustice. The ghosts would have to catch attention (i.e. trigger a feeling) with their signs so that their witnesses could be driven towards the resolution of their cases. One could assume that Jesus knew this would be quite a burden to carry, for those gifted with the ability to perceive the signs of the dead, resurrected.
That would be a lot to feel, for any given soul, and quite a reason to weep, for the Son, the Almighty, and just about anybody.
Maybe Jesus wept because he saw where the opening of the gate would inevitably lead humanity. Some would stick to an understanding of resurrection like the one He and Lazarus would know, which involved their body, therefore sounded like resuscitation, which isn’t the same thing, instead of finding solace in remembering the second half of Genesis 6:2, quoting The Almighty:
“My Spirit shall not abide in man forever, for he is flesh: his days shall be 120 years.”
Bringing back Lazarus from the dead would make billions after Him hope for the resuscitation of their own body, the body of those they love, and His Holy body, forgetting what led to Genesis 6, i.e. “Increased Corruption on Earth”, which upset the Almighty so much He only spared one family, that of a man, Noah, who at the time of the Flood had already lived 500 years.
Bringing back Lazarus from the dead would make billions after Him unable to connect with the signs of the everlasting presence of their beloved who have died, seeking a quick fix and simple answers to the three questions only The Father can comprehend, not even the Son, certainly not mere human beings:
“Why were we born?”
“Why do we die?”
“What comes after death?”
Maybe Jesus wept because He saw the flock of people who would lack humility and abuse their ability to connect with the Holy Spirit, may it be artists who would favour fame and glory over remembering that only He creates, and that artists are simply vehicles for the Almighty to spread His love and beauty among His creations, which includes mere human beings, or engineers convinced they have conquered the universe when they are flung in space in a rocket, sing a catchy song from an artist, come close to dying repairing the rocket, and once back on earth have the audacity to claim only they did something hard and find a way to talk down on ground control, surfing on fame and glory, with a smile and a high five.
Maybe Jesus wept because He understood Mary and Martha’s pain for the loss of their brother: He felt it too. Maybe He wept foreseeing that for every brother brought back to life, even in memory, there would be tons of brothers and sisters desperately hoping to escape the void de l’oubli.
“Remember me!” would scream robot Bender in Futurama, and that would be funny.
“Remember me!” would scream His billions of followers, forgetting what love means.
That was a lot to foresee, and quite a reason to weep.
Maybe Jesus wept once Martha warned him of the smell. Foul odours didn’t upset Him, but as she mentioned it to keep Him and everyone around from that awkward moment when they would smell her dead brother, like Antigone caring to protect the dignity of her dead brother before her, Jesus saw the billions of humans to follow who would develop shame around the mechanics of their bodies, including the sight and smell of rotting flesh, to the point of hiding symptoms of illnesses, such as blood in feces, by fear of triggering disgust, unaware of the fact that some people are born with the capacity to sustain the smell and sight of the dying, the rotting, the farting, the drooling, the smelly, without wondering why, without throwing shade, simply caring, knowing, like Phoebe Buffay would sing:
“Smelly cat, smelly cat, what are they feeding you?
Smelly cat, smelly cat, it’s not your fault!”
Life is messy. It can get ugly. The body is smelly, yet just as life, the body is holly.
Maybe Jesus wept considering those in need to understand the line of respect between requirements of personal hygiene and the need to let someone care for the sick, the weak and the dying.
That could be why He washed these feet, His and theirs. If they smelled, He could reminisce about roses. That’ll do the trick. If it didn’t, He could also discreetly apply some essential oils near His nostrils while He teaches. He couldn’t reveal his tricks, when He would love to share.
He left the recipes to the Lord, and the discovery to his disciples.
That was a lot to be able to do without being able to say.
That could easily make a grown man cry, maybe even a 33-year-old Jesus Christ.
#5: All that he wants is some honest and safe loving.
All that he gets is rubbish advice and opportunities.
Men had lost their ability to talk with other men in a constructive manner and under safe circumstances. Women had lost the curiosity to talk with just about anybody about men and women in ways that didn’t seek to demonstrate the superiority of women over men and the supremacy of their group of women over all other women alive at the time of their conversations.
With friends and family (altogether “Community”), women gossiped about other women to strengthen their bonds and assert their position in the clan.
With their Community, women complained about the men in their lives finding all sorts of stories to showcase their uselessness and lack of curiosity (altogether, their lack of intelligence). The juicier stories always fell back on the lack of curiosity of a man for the woman with whom he was or wished to be bound in Holly Matrimony.
When a woman in the Community opened up about violence she had witnessed or suffered from the body, the eye, or the words of a man, women who heard her stories without having been subjected by a man to such degrading behaviour pictured the scene of all the men they knew or could encounter asserting dominance over just about anybody by using their physical force, their powerful tools, their influence and her money to exert violence and not be held accountable for their sin, i.e. finding all sorts of ways to get away with it.
With friends, family, and strangers, women complained about men and what women perceived as men’s relentless pursuit of sex and power, which came at whatever cost, hence leading men into the temptation of seeking fame, authority, and money, all three means bringing (either interchangeably, independently, or altogether, i.e. in “wicked trinity”) to men the opportunity for sex and power.
With friends, family, and strangers, men wished to feel loved and to learn how to be loved and love in return properly.
All that he wants is some honest and safe loving.
All that he gets is rubbish advice and opportunities.
#6: There’s never any wrong question, but if there’s only one
To ponder over, so as to wonder, then one question could be
Why?
If we dare ask “Why?” Knowing we can only leave the answer to the Lord
Then we can add a loving “Wouldn’t it”, or two, or three, or as many
As we can think of, after the “Why?”, as long as it complies
With the cardinal rule according to which
[...]
Why didn’t Jesus write?
Why didn’t the Apostles write sooner?
Why did Jesus need two rides into the city?